Search for: "Majors v. Good"
Results 441 - 460
of 17,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
In last week’s case (Hans v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:45 am
This morning, the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Snyder v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
In Fisher Sand and Gravel Co v Neal A Sweebe, Inc, No. 297156, Judge Owens authored the majority opinion in this case of first impression, holding that the plaintiff’s claim for payment on an open account relating to the sale of goods was barred by the four year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:43 pm
Supreme Court has done much more harm than good. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:01 pm
The case is Minister of Mineral Resources v Stern & others. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
You can almost hear the justices in the majority addressing the student who felt marginalized by the creche on the courthouse steps in Lynch v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:08 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 4:18 pm
In Motiva v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:44 am
By Tobias ThienelIt's a good day for human rights law because the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has today delivered its judgments in Al-Skeini and Others v United Kingdom, Al-Jedda v United Kingdom and Bayatyan v Armenia. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:01 am
The majority, concededly, have certain rights to what has been termed ‘selfish ownership’ in the corporation which should be balanced against the concept of their fiduciary obligation to the minority. * * * Therefore, when minority stockholders in a close corporation bring suit against the majority alleging a breach of the strict good faith duty owed to them by the majority, we must carefully analyze the action taken by the controlling stockholders in… [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:27 pm
From today's Montana Supreme Court opinion in Meyer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am
The dissenting opinion also does not engage the majority opinion’s reliance on a state case called Luse v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
See, e.g., Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
(Eugene Volokh) So a two-judge majority on a Sixth Circuit panel held in Defoe v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
Good v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:32 am
And the following chart shows that we need more votes from center-right and right-of-center parties (this post continues below the tweet with some good news):This is how MEPs in the @EP_Legal voted on #copyright today. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
The decision of the conservative majority to significantly expand the scope of the good-faith exception to the Court signals a major paradigm shift in the jurisprudence of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
