Search for: "Mark S Rogers"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2020, 1:57 pm
President Trump hinted on Twitter that he planned to pardon his former political adviser Roger Stone, who was convicted of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his role in the Trump campaign’s cooperation with WikiLeaks in the website’s release of Hillary Clinton's hacked emails, the Washington Post reports. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Three days earlier, Krugman’s Times colleague Roger Cohen wrote in similar terms: Perhaps if Biden wins, the president will skulk out of the White House like the little boy he is who never grew into a man. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:45 am
Senators Richard Blumenthal and Mark Warner, and U.S. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:20 am
Rogers v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:57 am
Trade marks From the other side of the Atlantic, GuestKat Thomas Key shared a judgment from the 9th Circuit on the use of trade marks in expressive works. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:00 am
Rogers Test - ThresholdThe greeting cards derive from Chris Gordon's viralvideo, The Crazy Nastyass Honey BadgerOutlined in Rogers v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:28 am
To fill the budget hole left by releasing these funds, Defense Secretary Mark Esper proposed using funds that were supposed to be spent for projects overseas. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:42 am
Rogers, Amelia Xu, and Geetika Jerath, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, on Monday, April 20, 2020 Tags: Adverse effects, Covenants, COVID-19, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Termination, Underwriting The Paradox of Corporate Globalization: Disembedding and Reembedding Governing Norms Posted by John Gerard Ruggie (Harvard Kennedy School), on Monday, April 20, 2020 Tags: Corporate Social… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:19 am
Rogers dismissed the lawsuit by expressing doubt about the government’s ability to actually prevent Twitter from releasing the reports. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:08 am
Friday’s decision marked the end of this six-year legal battle. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm
Rogers prong two is meaningless if it’s just likely confusion all over again, but the court cited Twin Peaks Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:29 pm
”The nominative fair use defense failed because VIP didn’t use the mark itself, but rather a changed version with “significant differences. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:13 am
The federal judge overseeing the criminal case against Roger Stone yesterday refused to grant him a new trial, rejecting the defense’s argument that the jury forewoman had an improperly concealed bias against Stone, writes the New York Times. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 2:22 pm
The chief justice from 1832 to 1864 (thus for two of the terms under inspection, 1849 and 1862) was Roger Taney, who in 1857 authored the infamous majority decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
Strength of mark: strong. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am
The Rogers v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
*Rogers v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The court says “the Complaint fails to plausibly establish that Defendant used Plaintiff’s Mark in any other way than a non-trademark one. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Barshay, and Mark S. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:55 am
Rogers and Deputy Chief Judge Mark A. [read post]
