Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 441 - 460
of 34,442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:36 am
Defendant's motion to stay plaintiff's qui tam false marking case pending the Federal Circuit's resolution of Stauffer v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
’s (Weigel) registration of the mark W WEIGEL’S KITCHEN NOW OPEN on the ground that there was not likelihood of confusion with QuikTrip’s registered design mark, QT KITCHENS (QuikTrip West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am
Policy Implications Previously, I discussed how the court’s ruling in Humane Society v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
This careful distinction was because in Hearst Holdings v AVELA (aka the Betty Boop case, an infringement case) Birss J identified three classes of average consumers. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Last month, in a case called Unique Product Solutions v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
Sir Robin mentioned that overlap was also visible in the Dolly Blue case (William Edge & Sons Ltd v William Niccolls & Sons Ltd [1911] A.C. 693) between patents and passing off. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 6:25 am
Some banking services carry an element of riskAbanka DD v Abanca Corporacion Bancaria SA [2017] EWHC 2428 is a recent High Court appeal from the UK's Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:03 pm
Lastly, the Court addressed its earlier ruling in Pequignot v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:11 am
Williams, Questions Marks: Plurality Decisions and Precedential Constraint, which discusses lower courts' misuse of Marks v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
A few hours before the World Cup’s kick-off match, the General Court wrote another Chapter of the “R10” saga, concerning a trade mark related to one of the funniest Brazilian football players ever [Case T‑137/09 RENV, Nike International Ltd v OHIM, available in Frenchand Spanish]. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:06 pm
Additionally, two appeals were filed related to the pleading requirements of false marking cases (In re BP Lubricants) and the constitutionality of the false marking statute (FLFMC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
No, says the Dutch Court of Appeal in The Hague, although its reasoning is a little creative when it comes to its application of EU trade mark law.The decision is Zhu v Great Blue Sky Internationaland dates back to December 2013. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 2:38 am
Marks (St. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:00 am
Mark Lanier, of Vioxx fame; Mark P. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:48 am
Simonian v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 8:26 am
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (HH Judge Melissa Clarke) Jaguar Land Rover Ltd v Ineos Industries Holdings Ltd [2020] EWHC 2130 (Ch) (3 Aug 2020) On 11 April 2016, Jaguar Landrover Ltd. [read post]
