Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 441 - 460
of 34,448
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
App’x 513 (5th Cir. 2013); Spiral Direct, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Doe, decided Monday by Judge Mark Pittman (N.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Enlarge / Demonstrators participate in an abortion-rights rally outside the Supreme Court as the justices of the court hear oral arguments in the case of the US Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:24 am
” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court seems likely to preserve access to the abortion medication mifepristone. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
In the Court's view, the best description of the correct approach for a judge to assess evidence in trade mark infringement and passing off cases is found in Mr Justice Jacob's judgment in Neutrogena v Golden [1996] RPC 473: "The judge must consider the evidence adduced and use his own common sense and his own opinion as to the likelihood of deception. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
[Live commentary on the Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am
It was irrelevant that the contested trade mark may have been developed based on the word ‘hyundai’ because the public would still have to engage in a highly imaginative cognitive process in order to decipher the sign.PatentsRose Hughes reported on the first substantive decision of the UPC Court of Appeal, which reversed the preliminary injunction in 10x Genomics v NanoString. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:53 am
Murthy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am
Following the decision of the House of Lords, in Macmillan Inc v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:38 pm
” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court again confronts the issue of abortion, this time over access to widely used medication. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:47 pm
Sir Richard ArnoldAuthor Dakej2point3 Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Deed Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024)Yesterday I discussed the Court of Appeal's judgment in Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:33 am
By Mark S. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Court of Justice of the EU, Bundesverband Souvenir - Geschenke - Ehrenpreise v EUIPO, C-488/16 P, at para. 38). [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm
This marks a huge difference vis-à-vis the dictum of the General Court, not only in this case, but also in the SRB v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
This decision followed the Second Circuit’s earlier decision in Hamilton International Ltd v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:36 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024) In Lidl Great Britain Limited and another v Tesco Stores Ltd and another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch) (19 April 2023), Mrs Justice Joanna Smith held that Tesco Stores Ltd and Tesco Plc ("Tesco") were liable to& [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:49 pm
The court’s ruling in Nafeesa Syeed v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:13 am
That is the gist of the decision in Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc. v. [read post]
