Search for: "Markes v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 10,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
According to Section 45, a mark is used in commerce "on services when [1] it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and [2] the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:58 am
Genius Electronic Optical Co., Ltd, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1695, 27 April 2016 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:15 am
Since first filing their United States trademark opposition suit in 2015, Monster has continued their court battle against the Raptors for the last four years with no known resolution to date. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:52 pm
The Commerce Clause to the United States Constitution provides that Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
Sources: United States Patent and Trademark Office United States Patent and Trademark Office-Trademarks Home California Secretary of State-Trademarks and Service Marks Model State Trademark Law/CA. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
Oh sure, we all begin with the statement in Marks v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
Brunetti (Case No. 18-302), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is appealing to the Supreme Court from a U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
Case date: 12 January 2024 Case number: No. 21-55881 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition by… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:09 am
The article also stated that Double Coin's parent was seeking production facilities outside of China, including possibly the United States, in order to bring its tires sales back to the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:18 am
By: Geoffrey Dureska [6/17/22] THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DENIES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT IN CASE CONCERNING TIME TRAVELING, KNIFE-WEILDING, WESTERN ATTIRED HEROES WITH KNIGHTLY HERITAGE In late 2021, The Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
According to United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark examination protocol: “A sound mark identifies and distinguishes a product or service through audio rather than visual means. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
According to United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark examination protocol: "A sound mark identifies and distinguishes a product or service through audio rather than visual means. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
From Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977)4 Notably, the Texas courts have not adopted the Marks reasoning as a way to resolve splits on the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
