Search for: "Marks v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 21,512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But literally anyone, including the tribe itself, can register as a mark if it functions as a mark. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Ann Lipton – Business Law Prof Blog: “On Tuesday, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued her long-awaited opinion in Tornetta v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
For details, read “Sex predators expected for 2024 Super Bowl in Las Vegas,” written by Mark Robison, and published by the Reno Gazette Journal on February 6, 2023; and “Nevada politicians sign letter to NFL aiming to combat human trafficking at the Super Bowl,” written by Kevin Sheridan and published by KOLO8ABC on January 24, 2024. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A party that seeks sanctions for spoliation of evidence must show that the party having control over the evidence possessed an obligation to preserve it at the time of its destruction, that the evidence was destroyed with a culpable state of mind, and that the destroyed evidence was relevant to the party’s claim or defense such that the trier of fact could find that the evidence would support that claim or defense” (Pegasus Aviation I, Inc. v Varig Logistica… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Mark Lunney (King's College London, UK)9. [read post]