Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 441 - 460
of 722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
As an initial matter, TSCA “does not include chemical substances subject to other US statutes such as foods and food additives, pesticides, drugs, cosmetics, tobacco, nuclear material, or munitions.” Greenhouse gases are indeed subject to other U.S. statutes (i.e. the Clean Air Act); this was the gravamen of the Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 2:40 pm
Writing for the 5-4 majority in the case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 9:21 am
This endangerment finding is a direct response to the Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v EPA - in which the U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:22 am
The EPA's finding was prompted by the US Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:04 pm
To be fair, the US Supreme Court opened the door for the EPA to make this move in its decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court's ruling in EPA v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:20 pm
Adler) Former EPA Administrator Johnson on GHG regulation (video interview) Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:41 am
Supreme Court decision of Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
Supreme Court held that greenhouse gases are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act in the Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:32 am
Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:32 am
Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
We at NRDC are proud to have been part of the state-environmental legal team that took the Bush administration to the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 12:36 pm
From MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:32 am
Supreme Court's finding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:33 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:33 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:17 am
Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:10 am
To read the Senate's climate change bill, S.1733, click here.In addition to lowering the 2020 target for greenhouse has emissions, Baucus also hoped to attached preemption language to the Senate bill that would stop EPA from implementing a 2007 Supreme Court opinion, Massachusetts v. [read post]
