Search for: "Matter of Andrew B." Results 441 - 460 of 1,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit held that this evidence was not an inappropriate “truth on the market” defense—which seeks to argue that, prior to a particular plaintiff’s purchases, accurate information regarding the subject matter of the claim had already been revealed and thus that defendants’ stock price had already declined accordingly—but rather a permissible “price impact” rebuttal.[9] Although the Second Circuit “espouse[d] no views as to… [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit); and (3) whether a court may abstain from exercising jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis, as a matter of discretionary international comity, over an otherwise valid Sherman Antitrust Act claim involving purely domestic injury. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit); and (3) whether a court may abstain from exercising jurisdiction on a case-by-case basis, as a matter of discretionary international comity, over an otherwise valid Sherman Antitrust Act claim involving purely domestic injury. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 10:02 am by Ezra Rosser
Preliminaries aside, I am troubled both by Warren’s claim/explanation and by the way fellow progressives have rushed to defend her or pretend such a claim shouldn’t matter. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 12:01 pm by Robert B. Lamm
  I’m thinking of some recent articles, including one by the inimitable Andrew Ross Sorkin entitled “Fixing the ‘Brain Damage’ Caused by the I.P.O. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
MARTINEZ, Justice.Hunters Mill Association, Inc. appeals a take nothing judgment entered in favor of Andrew J. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
MARTINEZ, Justice.Hunters Mill Association, Inc. appeals a take nothing judgment entered in favor of Andrew J. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The mandatory payment of fees under the Rand formula was a claimed violation of his s. 2(b) rights. [read post]