Search for: "Matter of Beers v Beers"
Results 441 - 460
of 615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 4:40 pm
Beautiful country, great beer, etc. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:37 pm
Four beers for your 120-pound female friend. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
His presentation, entitled ”Enforcement of trade mark rights cross border: the issue of territoriality”, produced a breathtakingly comprehensive checklist of issues which, for good measure, he entwined within the fictional account of the dispute in Aldebaran AG v Betelgeuse NV. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:50 am
[T]he officers noticed an open beer can between McNeil's seat and the passenger-side door. . . . [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
6,848,875 and continuation 6,935,826 claim beer or soda pop cans. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
TTAB Affirms Refusal Of "LUVD G & Design" over "THE LOVED DOG" for ClothingSnack on This: TTAB Sustains 2(d) Opposition to MYCHEW over HI-CHEW for CandyTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Two Cases of Beer and WineTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is Candy Related to Chocolate Drink Mix? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:24 am
At most it could have suspended the opposition proceedings until a final judgment on the matter was delivered. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
The two-beer dispute that gave rise to this matter all started when plaintiff went to lunch one workday with two co-workers. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:01 am
Making matters worse was the fact that the man was deaf and couldn’t hear all the passing motorists honking at him and begging him to stop. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:26 pm
Estrella v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm
Ed. 2d 222 (1984) (impoundment justified where driver placed in custody and passenger had been observed drinking beer). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
§ 57-5-301(e)(1) (2002) (making it illegal for minors to possess beer ‘for any purpose’). [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:20 am
Moreover, State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
The communication and interaction between [the child] and his mother displayed a strong and secure attachment as well as a familiarity in playful and fun activities together.Later [the mother]’s partner, [Mr V] entered the room and [the child] engaged easily in play with him and the communication appeared relaxed and familiar.In relation to his mother, the child told the family consultant he liked “walking and dancing and watching TV with mum and I have heaps of toys. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:33 am
However, that does not take the matter far. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am
“Indispensable” as a practical matter; creator has been rewarded out of proportion to social benefit—as in the Lotus v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
” The judge then begins to dig into the matter. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:55 am
Many of these rulings against employers, like Lewis v. [read post]
