Search for: "Matter of Booker"
Results 441 - 460
of 557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2015, 3:34 pm
If anyone has any spare facts going, perhaps they could wrap them and send them to C Booker c/o The Telegraph. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
In addressing this claim, the Court assumed for the sake of argument that Booker reasonableness review applies to the consecutive/concurrent decision. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:14 pm
Booker, 436 F.3d 238 (D.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm
It is not unheard of for the defendant (and, rarely, his lawyer) to make evidence unavailable by hiding, manipulating or destroying it, or by bribing and/or threatening potential witnesses.We should not lose sight of this central factor -- the government's ability to produce the evidence -- when we talk about a different matter, the standard of proof at sentencing. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:05 am
The Seventh Circuit pointed out that while the sentencing guidelines have been advisory since 2005 with Booker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
Honourable mentions also go to Sang Nkhwazi (Mancunium IP), whose bouncy prose might win him a Pulitzer or Man Booker Prize if only he can be persuaded to give up his day job for a career in literature, and to the Wardblawgger Gavin Ward, for his sheer enthusiasm. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 9:17 pm
Of course, the flip side of Booker is that the judge is also free to “tailor the sentence” above the guidelines. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 5:40 am
Whether it meant creating crimes that didn’t exist, lying about people they didn’t like, giving up their mothers, it didn’t matter. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:28 pm
The law blogger, Carl Gardner, has been concerned about this case, and in particular about John Hemming’s use of parliamentary privilege, since last April, and in his latest post on the matter he recounts his quest since then to get to the bottom of this. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
The only real justification the government advanced for the subject being a matter of Federal law was the Commerce Clause, but the 4th Circuit relied on a couple of Supreme Court decisions in the past decade or so in rejecting that argument.The first was US v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Cory Booker (N.J.), Sen. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:54 am
(Domestic politics are another matter.) [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 3:35 am
If Cory Booker would make a damn fine Senator, who cares what color his skin is? [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:08 am
As noted in today’s New York Daily News, Mayor Corey Booker presided over 7 same sex marriage ceremonies some time after midnight. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:31 am
In sentencing, where judgment should matter most, I could not exercise my judgment. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 10:13 am
However, in 2005 the Supreme Court of the United States issued a ruling in United States v Booker that threw out the mandatory nature of sentencing guidelines. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 12:50 pm
While they have fallen short on data protection, consumer privacy, and national security matters, Big Tech has given society more than it has taken. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 5:58 am
See Troy Stanebow Article "Deconstructing the Myth of the Child Pornography Guidelines" Child pornography is a serious matter and efforts should be made to eliminate it entirely. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Senior Judge Booker wrote for a unanimous panel. [read post]
