Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
Some of my Cato colleagues have filed an amicus brief in support of the cert petition. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
And change in the law matters as well, for without it we would still be living under Plessy v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:21 am
As a matter of law, the Court concludes that the Penalties provision reaches Airbnb in its capacity as a booking agent and payment processor. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Bath Marine Draftsmen’s 5 156 NLRB 411 (1965), enfd. 376 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 843 (1967). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:45 am
Department of Justice) addressed the question of "Why Patent Law’s Right to Exclude Is Pro-competitive". [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:28 am
The Supreme Court has granted cert in three cases, a two-to-one circuit court split, to decide the question of what “sex” means under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:55 am
That brought a sharp retort from Justice Sonia Sotomayor: Aren’t we rewarding you for not raising it adequately below, rewarding you for mentioning it in two sentences in your cert petition and not asking us to take it as a separate question presented? [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
L. 263 (2010] Further complicating matters, the public’s response to the Supreme Court has changed in recent years. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” The judge did not address these questions. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In SOCAN v CAIP [2004] 2 SCR 427 the Supreme Court applied the real and substantial connection test to hold that the Copyright Act right of communication to the public can be infringed if there is a sufficient connection between this country and the communication in question. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm
We review this legal question de novo. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
With the Circuit Courts split on this "wholly groundless" exception, the Supreme Court granted cert. to decide the question of whether the exception is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
The question that confuses everyone is what to do with opened e-mails. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
Preap, we should be frustrated by the justices’ continued refusal to explain why Chevron doesn’t matter in cases like this. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Gupta said they would, because the Appeals Council would still be reviewing the matter on which a hearing [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
All of this brings us to the question: What are the options a conservative Supreme Court majority might pursue if it were to take up the HLR case? [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:10 am
Sorry, Louisiana — and good luck arguing that this case doesn’t matter when the one blog every law clerk reads has declared it so crucial that it merits its own pre-petition symposium. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
The merger doctrine holds that expressions in works of authorship are unprotectable by copyright law when, as a practical matter, there is only a limited number of ways to express an idea, fact, or function. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
The officials pointed to precedent where they upheld a city ordinance forbidding street distribution of commercial and business advertising matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
City of New London and New London Development Company, 843 A2d 500 (Conn. 2004), cert. granted, 125 S. [read post]
