Search for: "Matter of Doyle"
Results 441 - 460
of 491
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
The nurses had simultaneous resigned from positions at the nursing home.Subjected to criminal prosecution as a result of their action, the Appellate Division held that "these criminal prosecutions constitute an impermissible infringement upon the constitutional rights of these nurses and their attorney and that "the issuance of a writ of prohibition [an order issued by a higher court commanding a lower court to cease from proceeding in some matter] to halt these prosecutions is… [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:06 am
Masters said she was "not in a position to say” whether she’s been contacted by administration officials about the job, but said she remains supportive of the Obama administration "no matter what they do on the issue. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
., et al: Disability claim dismissed because Plaintiff Was Not "Otherwise Qualified" to Perform the Essential Functions of Her Job* FILED* [1-14] Lockheed Martin sued by women for class-based sex/denial of opportunities for advancement discrim; more here* NEWS* [1-13] Teaneck fires Township Mgr following string of harassment lawsuitsNYDECIDED* [1-13] St Ct App: Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 1:07 am
Doyle, — N.Y.S.2d —-, 2009 WL 93065 (Appellate Division, 2nd Department, January 13, 2009). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:04 am
NYLJ: Matter of Vinluan v, Doyle Matter of Vinluan v, Doyle APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT Legal Profession January 22, 2009 Before: Santucci, J.P.; Angiolillo; Eng; Chambers, JJ. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:04 am
Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:01 pm
Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:09 pm
Doyle (pdf), 08-02568. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:01 pm
In his post yesterday on the new Thirteenth Amendment case Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:01 pm
Doyle (N.Y. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:20 pm
" However, said the court, Palmer sought only to vindicate his "individual interests," and did not file a notice of claim as mandated by Public Authorities Law §1299-p(1) before initiating his law suit, a fatal omission.With respect to efforts "to vindicate and individual interest," in determining the applicability of the three-month notice of claim requirement of Education Law 3813(1) to statutory or nonjudicial proceedings involving school districts, school… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:01 pm
" Which provokes Palladian: "No, I wouldn't be having fun no matter who won this miserable election. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) because it was jurisdictionally barred by the FCA's public disclosure bar; it was "based upon" Defendants' disclosure to the government; and Plaintiff was not an "original source". [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 2:56 pm
As Arthur Conan Doyle said, "Knowledge begets knowledge, as money bears interest".The functional consequence of this trend is that the system is becoming a victim of its own success. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:01 am
You remember, there was a television show all about them, called the Scott Peterson Trial, starring Mark Geragos as Bozo the Lawyer.Via Bashman, Micheal Doyle at the McClatchy Newspapers decided to follow up to see how effective this law has been in curbing the federal plague of murdering the unborn. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
[The Court ultimately concludes this is a Doyle violation and that it is not harmless error.] * * * Here, approximately one or two weeks before the initial trash pull, Detective Early received information from a reliable source regarding cocaine dealing out of Teague's residence. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:44 pm
Doyle, 756 N.E.2d 576, 579 (Ind. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 8:12 pm
Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 274 (1977)] framework for assessing public employees' claims of retaliation for First Amendment activity. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:05 am
BHMK Attorney Tom Doyle represented the nurse in the matter at hearing and on appeal. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Specifically, Thornberry argues that the grant of summary judgment was erroneous because the designated evidence established as a matter of law that Hobart violated certain provisions of the Open Door Law1 with regard to the termination proceedings and because there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether Thornberry was properly notified that his leave under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) would run concurrently with his paid leave that Hobart provided. [read post]
