Search for: "Matter of Levinson"
Results 441 - 460
of 482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2007, 9:27 am
Editorial comment added by Levinson.] [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 4:06 am
Check out Sandy Levinson's important post on Balkanization yesterday. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 5:59 am
Over the past several years, constitutional scholars Larry Sabato, Sanford Levinson, and Richard E. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
As Sandy Levinson has observed, the ad was extraordinarily "dumb politics. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
Sandy Levinson is first up. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 4:12 pm
Bruce Ackerman and Sandy Levinson were important here. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:26 pm
The paper suggests that constitutional law has a substantial effect explaining legal agreements in the face of policy disagreements (would Sandy Levinson's polemics against the constitution make sense in a world in which constitutions meant anything) and explaining why constitutional conflicts are over some matters and not others. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
As Sandy Levinson and I have written, we are in a gradual transition from a National Security State to a National Surveillance State. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
It was considered a fairly settled, noncontroversial matter. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 12:06 pm
And during President Bush's first term in office, Democrats, while in the minority, filibustered several of President Bush's judicial nominations because they understood all too well that appointments matter. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:30 am
There appears to be no other explanation than party loyalty for the Republican's unwillingness even to allow a vote on the matter. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
Isn't that all that matters? [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
Ackerman has distinguished his theory from Sandy Levinson's and my partisan entrenchment theory precisely on the grounds that we do not sufficiently recognize the decisive significance of movement parties in constitutional revolutions. [read post]
23 May 2007, 11:53 am
Even at Yale, which has long had a reputation for not caring much about law at all, this simply isn't the case.Apropos of Yale's reputation, this post wouldn't be complete without poking a little fun at my own law school, so let me close with this story, which Sandy Levinson likes to tell. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:01 pm
("A week before that March 11th deadline, I had a private meeting with the attorney general for an hour, just the two of us, and I laid out for him what we had learned and what our analysis was in this particular matter. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:07 pm
Yet the evidence provides good reason for thinking that on matters of foreign policy, environment degradation, and basic decency, ordinary Americans lack the virtues necessary to manage a contemporary constitution. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 11:30 pm
Levinson, Eric Schmidt and Jerry York: We are not going to enter into a public debate with Fred Anderson or his lawyer. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 6:17 pm
K1297 - Product liability - medical devices - defense of preemptionMark Herrman and Jim Beck present Why Does Preemption Matter? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
Levinson notes approvingly that many on the left seem to be trying to "revive some classical central-liberal verities. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 5:14 pm
Rev. 34 (1992) quickly became a cause celebre, producing an entire symposium issue of responses in the Michigan Law Review, including one by Sandy Levinson of this blog.By the time Edwards published his article, however, the handwriting was already on the wall. [read post]
