Search for: "Matter of McConnell"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm
Mitch McConnell is indeed despicable, and everyone should be contributing to his opponent, but we should face the fact that even his removal would not solve the problems created in 1787. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
(and, for that matter, in the U.K.) refuse to walk up to various lines. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
It is not an analysis of whether he was hired properly, years before; it is not a matter of whether he was supervised at any time during the shift; it is not an analysis of what his training was. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
Reparations may technically be the right word, but it’s not helping matters. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Chao’s aide Todd Inman, who stated in an email to McConnell’s Senate office that Chao had personally asked him to serve as an intermediary, helped advise the senator and local Kentucky officials on grants with special significance for McConnell, including a highway-improvement project in a McConnell political stronghold that had been twice rejected for previous grant applications. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
As many have noted, our own era is not an age where the proclivity to compromise is applauded, and it remains to be seen if a Democratic Congress can figure out a way to "check and balance" a President who has exhibited exemplary skills in bringing his political party to heel and making such figures as Lindsay Graham or Mitch McConnell "useful idiots" for his aggrandizing views of presidential power. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
" Medicare for All, whatever one thinks of it as a matter of public policy, is extraordinarily unlikely to become law even in the relatively unlikely event that the Democrats should sweep the 2020 elections and regain the Senate. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
And McConnell’s re-election campaigns have received more than $1 million in contributions from Chao’s extended family. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 1:47 pm
The difference between judging and doing justice matters. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:45 am
Or Chuck Schumer’s or Mitch McConnell’s. [read post]
3 May 2019, 5:58 am
Professor McConnell concludes: What does this history tell us? [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:43 pm
While it describes sensitive intelligence matters, it does so in an unclassified manner. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
And since the affiant purported to recite information gleaned from attached exhibits that actually reflected something else, it did not meet the criteria governing the acceptability of affidavits by interested witnesses under the summary judgment rule: "A summary judgment may be based on uncontroverted testimonial evidence of an interested witness, or of an expert witness as to subject matter concerning which the trier of fact must be guided solely by the opinion testimony of… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Or they may consciously adopt the role of “public intellectuals,” where the key datum is the receptivity of reporters or the editors of op-ed pages to solicit their views about pressing matters of the day. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
As a matter of binding doctrine, courts can strike down entire laws based on the unconstitutionality of a single provision. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
As a matter of binding doctrine, courts can strike down entire laws based on the unconstitutionality of a single provision. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:31 pm
Today an amicus brief was filed in the Affordable Care Act case in the Fifth Circuit, on behalf of Kevin Walsh, Michael McConnell, and me. [read post]
