Search for: "Matter of Nichols" Results 441 - 460 of 613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
Responsible reporting on matters of public interest The Reynolds defence – or Reynolds/Jameel defence – is meant to provide proper protection for responsible reporting on matters of public interest. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
The rule has been disapplied in “Reynolds/Jameel” cases, because of the need to make that defence practical and effective: Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 PC at [21-22] (Lord Nicholls). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:43 pm by Mark Radcliffe
Linus Torvalds stated: “User programs are _clearly_ not derived works of the kernel, and as such whatever the kernel license is just doesn’t matter. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
These are broadly based on the factors set out in Lord Nicholls’ speech in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 205). [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 pm by Ross Todd
The lawyers whose settlement of a class action suit arising from the $170 million merger of Nighthawk Radiology and Virtual Radiologic Corporation prompted questions of "forum shopping" and "collusive" behavior from Delaware Vice-Chancellor J. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
Much of the book (for instance the matters about health or bereavement) does not fall into this category in any event. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:40 am by Maxine Eichner
As a routine matter, poor Americans have no access to counsel in cases dealing with important issues like child custody, housing, employment, health care, and so forth. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:25 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0175, 2011 MT 33, PENNY ANN NICHOLS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am by INFORRM
The defendant could not recover his costs of pleadings in those matters or any costs occasioned by those matters Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] EWHC 159 (QB) – 2 Feb 2011. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 As to a public figure, one can only be held liable if he or she knows that the statement is false and that it defames another person, or if he or she acts in reckless disregard of such matters. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:45 am by Jeffrey
We are a law firm located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, that handles personal injury matters, consumer disputes, business issues, social security problems, and immigration concerns. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:10 am by emagraken
 Interesting reasons were recently brought to my attention addressing the limit of the Court to address contested matters at CPC’s and TMC’s. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  On 25 January 2011 the Committee heard evidence from Lords Lester and Nicholls and Professor Anthony Bradley. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:26 am by INFORRM
  Such practice was foreseen as only acceptable where the complained matter consists of related material. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am by INFORRM
  He agreed with the Court of Appeal and the dissenting speeches of Lords Nicholls and Hoffmann that the additional ifnormation served mostly to “add colour and conviction” to the story. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:33 am by INFORRM
I think we already have the basis of a defence of honest journalism – through the Nicholls and Hoffman criteria in the Reynolds Defence as applied in the Wall Street Journal/Jameel case and in the Mclagan case. [read post]