Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G."
Results 441 - 460
of 2,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 7:30 am
In November 2018, a North Carolina court clerk advised the Surrogate’s Court that a North Carolina court had determined (a) North Carolina to be a “significant-connection state” under UAGPPJA, and (b) New York to be J.D.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
In some instances these issues touch on matters that have significant relevance to political and legal theory generally, and for this reason alone are worth reading. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
Since this letter was indicated as being a reply to the registrar's communication on technical matters, it was not brought to the attention of the Board. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
” Wickham v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:29 am
The interpretation of a written trust is a matter of law to be resolved by the court. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am
EXAMINATION PROCEEDINGS / DECISION UNDER APPEAL[...]B. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
THOMAS G. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 4:43 pm
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the sixth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 1:26 pm
Schofield's opinion Thursday in Women for America First v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 6:17 am
The Board had denied Applicant ASW's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, but on reconsideration granted the motion in part. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
FDNY had withheld those records on the grounds that: [1] Releasing such records would be an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy within the meaning of Public Officers Law §87(2)(b); and [2] The records withheld were inter-agency materials exempt by Public Officers Law §87(2)(g). [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am
In addition to the usual procedures, heightened approval guidelines govern assessments or investigations that touch on “sensitive investigative matters”—such as those involving a target who is a public official or political candidate or who works at a media organization. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am
P. 26(b)(1) provides the permissible scope of discovery, limiting it to “any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case . . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am
P. 26(b)(1) provides the permissible scope of discovery, limiting it to “any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case . . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 6:46 am
P. 26(b)(1) provides the permissible scope of discovery, limiting it to “any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case . . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 5:57 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Analysis With our hypothetical in place, let’s consider some basic analysis. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019… [read post]
