Search for: "Matter of S.W." Results 441 - 460 of 1,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 10:52 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 - 6/24/2015 Here, however, even assuming all of AETC's asserted facts are true, they do not establish as a matter of law that the U.S. has the present right to compel legal title. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:52 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 - 6/24/2015 Here, however, even assuming all of AETC's asserted facts are true, they do not establish as a matter of law that the U.S. has the present right to compel legal title. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Where the issue of immediate possession necessarily involves resolution of a title dispute, the justice court is divested of subject-matter jurisdiction and has no power to render judgment. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by MBettman
Chambers, 883 S.W.2d 650 (Tex.1994) (when analyzing a police officer’s liability in a high-speed pursuit, an important factor to be considered is the danger that the threat of such liability would deter an officer’s willingness to execute his office with the decisiveness and the judgment required by the public good.) [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:38 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Regarding the present matter, the Court reasoned that the “allegations within the initial complaint clearly identified Defendant in his individual capacity as the proper party,” and that defendant was served personally. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Truman, 194 S.W.2d 29 (Mo. 1946).)John Kennedy: During the 1960 presidential campaign an automobile accident in California resulted in two companion lawsuits being filed in late October 1960 against candidate John F. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm by Michael Grossman
No matter how the law is portrayed in the media, slick hustler attorneys rarely slip weak cases past 12 competent adults. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:55 am by Andy Taylor
App. 47, 249 S.W.3d 847 (2007) (holding that an order on “various post-divorce disputes” was not final where it specifically reserved a ruling on child support. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 5:47 am by SHG
State, 309 S.W.3d 168, 171 (Tex. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:58 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Turning to the present matter, the Court determined: [P]laintiff’s allegations involve matters that are not within the common knowledge of an ordinary person—matters involving the mental and physical capacities of both the attacking patient and the decedent. [read post]