Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh" Results 441 - 460 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2010, 8:58 am by INFORRM
  The case is Hatfield v TCN Channel 9 [2010] NSWCA 69. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
Related posts:Fraudulent alienation of foreign immovables and the Moçambique rule in the Western Australian Court of Appeal Singh v Singh (2009) 253 ALR 575; [2009] WASCA 53,... [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by charonqc
Thankfully, while Tom Watson blocks libel reform on the grounds that Parliament needs more time (Infra), the Court of Appeal has stepped in to bring a degree of sanity into libel proceedings in BCA v Dr Singh. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
  The contrast with the approach of the Court of Appeal in British Chiropractic Assocation v Singh is instructive. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by charonqc
British Chiropractic Association v Dr Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 The Guardian reported: “The science writer Simon Singh has won his court of appeal battle for the right to rely on the defence of fair comment in a libel action. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:10 am by Adam Wagner
British Chiropractic Association v Dr Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 (Read judgment) Dr Simon Singh has won the first battle in the libel action, brought by the British Chiropractic Association (BCA), in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:18 am
United Cerebral Palsy of New York City NEW YORK COUNTYGovernmentCourt Affirms Pension Fund's Decision to Deny Disability, Retirement Benefits to Officer With HIV Matter of Costigan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by INFORRM
Although the Simon Singh appeal (see our posts here and here) was the most newsworthy libel case last week, another interesting matter was being dealt with in the Courts. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:03 am by V.Venkatesan
By Renu GuptaGuest BloggerThis post refers to Supreme Court's decision in State of Uttaranchal v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:21 am
W.NASSAU COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawCourt Finds No Binding Settlement Agreement Reached by Parties; Matter Set for TrialDarshan Singh Bagga LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Rosalind English
The school argued that the matrilineal test was based on religious law and the discrimination the school had applied based on the test was religious discrimination, not racial discrimination under s.1 RRA; they also contended that although there was a Jewish ethnic group as defined by the criteria set out in Mandla (Sewa Singh) v Dowell Lee (1983) 2 AC 548 HL, the matrilineal test described a group that overlapped with, but was not identical to, the ethnic group. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 1:02 pm by MacIsaac
There is caselaw that suggests that matters relating solely to credibility may be produced when punitive damages are being claimed (see for example Rioux v. [read post]