Search for: "Meade v. Meade" Results 441 - 460 of 751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  This appears to be in contrast with the finding of Mr Justice Mellor in InterDigital v Lenovo that all past infringements should be paid for (even if that involves ignoring limitation periods), as well as comments made elsewhere by Mr Justice Meade that liability arises from first use of the patented technology. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:39 am by Robert C. Lehrman
In a 17 page order, Judge Miller denied Tito’s motion for summary judgement in Hofmann v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even if this case does not qualify for an extension under the "good cause" exception (see Mead v Singleman, 24 AD3d 1142, 1144 [2005]), we find that it qualifies under the "interest of justice" category. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
  Richard Meade QC (8 New Square), for Actavis, argued that the form of the cross-undertaking sought be his client was fair. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
| Richard Meade QC appointed to the High Court The Global Innovation Index (GII) 2020 has been released [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:21 pm
Prebish Founders Award:               Gene ZenobiThe Rodney Thaxton “Against All Odds” Award:      Team of   U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Supreme Court: McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 3:48 pm
Jose Rodriguez gets stopped by some federal rangers in Lake Mead because it seems like he's drunk. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
* Endoscope and remedial scope: inside view of an application for summary judgment Medical Innovations Ltd v Eakins and others is a Chancery Division, England and Wales decision delivered by Richard Meade QC. [read post]