Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 441 - 460 of 1,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law that, among other things, requires licensed centers to post notices to inform patients about the availability of state-funded family-planning services, including abortion; he notes that although the “justices won’t be dealing with broader questions about the right to an abortion, the outcome could affect not only California’s law, but those in other states that… [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 10:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-6381, the now-dismissed case involving the retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:20 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Uber Driver Is An Employee, Not An Independent Contractor, Rules California Labor Official, June 17, 2015, Huffington Post More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:09 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:56 am by CJLF Staff
  Alanna Durkin Richer of the Associated Press reports that a Maryland judge rejected Malvo's claim that he was entitled to be re sentenced because of the Supreme Courts 2012 holding in Miller v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
On August 5, the U.S. attorney's office for Northern California filed a brief informing the court that the federal government may seek to intervene in the matter, as it previously did in the Stauffer v. [read post]