Search for: "Mitchell v. Mitchell" Results 441 - 460 of 3,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Outside the matrimonial action context, trial courts have also applied the best for all concerned standard when determining ownership and custody of pets (Mitchell v Snider, 51 Misc 3d 1229 [Civ Ct NY Co 2016] [replevin action between former paramours]; Ramseur v Askins, 44 Misc 3d 1209 [A] [Civ Ct Bx Co 2014] [replevin action between nephew and aunt]; see also Hennet v Allan, 543 Misc 3d 542 [SC Albany Co 2014] [citing Travis in determining that the dispute… [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:05 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
6193299 NRM 6193298 SHAMBAUGH & SON 6196920 MAINTAIN THE EDGE 6196917 C 6196916 C HOTEL CARMICHAEL 6196901 GUNZONEDEALS.COM 6193077 WOODTURNINGZ 6193076 WOODTURNINGZ 6192951 DXEXCHANGE 6192844 YOUNGER THAN SPRINGTIME DERMOPHILIC MOISTURE CREAM 6192739 WHIN 6196505 PLINK 6192734 WABASH HEARTLAND INNOVATION NETWORK 6192733 WABASH HEARTLAND 6196187 ELEMENTS BY LASHAE 6196059 WELI 6196029 LET’S FUEL THE WONDER 6195910 VISION MOLECULAR 6195800 MITCHELL-HEDGES CRYSTAL SKULL 6195701 … [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I have defended detainees at the base since shortly after they arrived and was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 7:34 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Hicks rule This case is a State appeal from the dismissal of the indictments in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City based upon an alleged violation of Maryland Code of Criminal Procedure § 6-1031 and Maryland Rule 4-271, commonly known together as the Hicks rule. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:57 am by Daily Record Staff
Mitchell presents one issue on appeal, which we have reworded ... [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
However Justice Mitchell, joined by 3 other justices wrote concurring opinion that said in part:I write separately, however, to state my view that Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The respondent had had a business connection with Mr Mitchell. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
A finding of an independent intervening event does not necessarily result in a break in the chain of causation and a finding of no liability: see Jobling v Associated Dairies Ltd, [1981] 2 All ER 752 (HL) [Jobling]; see also Penner v Mitchell (1978), 1978 ALTASCAD 201 (CanLII), 89 DLR (3d) 343 (ABCA) [Penner]. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 8:56 am by Howard Wasserman
Mitchell, The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy, 104 VA.L.REV. 933, 936 (2018). [read post]