Search for: "Mock v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 859
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
In Bittman v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
On May 16, Justice Scalia traveled to Raleigh, where he delivered the keynote address at the 2015 National High School Mock Trial Championship. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Keri Gould Team Members: Paul Cirner (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Debbie Robbins (3L), Max Spaeth (3L) This first annual internal mock trial competition welcomed four schools to participate in the competition involving a case of State v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Although the Republican governor of Texas ordered his own state guard to “monitor” the U.S. military while it is in his state (which is, of course, still one of the fifty united states that our armed forces protect), and even though the reliably unhinged Rep. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:25 pm
Abbott Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm
Northeastern State University). [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Quantum particles, in contrast, exhibit what physicists call quantum entanglement (a concept Einstein mocked as “spooky action at a distance”). [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
After all, "holiday" is no more than a state of mind, surely. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm
Thus anticipating the political philosophy of Hobbes, Machiavelli states that the moral and justice does not pre-exist to the state, but they are result of state. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:49 pm
Additional Resources: Feliciano v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am
Defamation on Facebook: Isparta v Richter 2013 6 SA 529 (GP) Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2014, Anneliese Roos and Magda Slabbert, SSRN The Resistance of Memory: Could the European Union’s Right to be Forgotten Exist in the United States? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
Binion v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
This was expanded on in that there was clearly no possibility of a mutually agreeable settlement if each party was to maintain their proposed price, and movement on this fundamental point seemed unlikely (and in any case would be seen as against competition law).Each party was then given 5 minutes to state their conclusions. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:23 am
THE PEOPLE V. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:27 am
He also allegedly mocked Ms. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
US states are considering tightening regulations. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In Walker v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
In Bryant v. [read post]
