Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 441 - 460
of 729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 10:29 pm
While rule 27.3 contemplates the trial court's ability to modify or amend orders that have been appealed, neither the December 12, 2012 Order nor the May 1, 2013 Order modified or amended the trial court's November 12, 2012 Order. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
LEXIS 2373, handed down its much-anticipated opinion regarding stormwater runoff from logging roads. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
In addition, each post has three links following it: (1) to the online version of the post, (2) to the location in the introduction where the post is mentioned, and (3) to the post’s location in the list of posts. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
On February 1, 2012, the Second Circuit issued an opinion in favor of the merchants. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am
On June 3, 2013, Ocasio filed his Response to TLO's Motion to Quash. . . . [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:53 am
Hagenau) (click here for opinion), the issue before the Court was whether a Debtor can pay the redemption price from a tax sale through a Chapter 13 plan, where her petition was filed on the eve of the expiration of her right to redeem. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
May 10, 2013), which decided a number of very interesting issues (including preemption) in the context of motions in limine filed in an Aredia/Zometa case. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board found these requests to be inadmissible.*** Translation of the French original ***[1.1] Claims 1 of the main request and of auxiliary requests 1 to 3 have been amended by introducing the subject-matter of claims 5, 7, and 8 of the patent as granted (which correspond to original claims 5, 7, and 8). [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Domestic Relations Law § 240(1–b)(f)(10) and FCA § 413(1)(f)(10) state that, after performing the requisite calculations, “the court shall order the non-custodial parent to pay his or her pro rata share of the basic child support obligation. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The partial sequence of P1 as depicted in figures 1 to 3 (corresponding to figures 1 to 3 of the patent) encodes 544 amino acids (about 16% of the complete sequence). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Ranguis on March 1, 2013. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:46 pm
., Div. 6), ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2013 WL 541581 (filed 1/10/13, modified 2/8/13). [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:29 am
No. 10-805-CJB, at 1-4 (D. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
Plans for the remodel were submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for approval:The first set depicted what amounted to a “substantial” remodel since it (1) improved the overall value of the property more than 50% and (2) modified more than 50% of the existing walls. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The EBA further stated that neither decision G 1/93 nor decision G 1/03 intended to modify the general definition of the requirements of A 123(2) established in opinion G 3/89 and decision G 11/91, which definition has become the generally accepted “gold” standard for assessing any amendment for its compliance with A 123(2). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm
Cir. 2013) Download 2011-1434.Opinion.1-18-2013.1Panel: Newman (author), Lourie, Prost In Rexnord v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
The CSA provided in material part that: (1) the Regents would place specific restrictions on enrollment and would increase on-campus housing; (2) the City would seek LAFCO approval of an SOI amendment, and not oppose the Regents’ request for extraterritorial water and sewer services for North Campus; and (3) if LAFCO denied the SOI amendment, or its approval was overturned, the Regents’ housing commitment was excused. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Patent system to a “first-to-file” format. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Patent system to a “first-to-file” format. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The present decision contains some very interesting statements on the essentiality test formulated in T 331/87.The appeal was filed after the Examining Division (ED) had refused the application under consideration.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation)Sanitary fitting comprising (a) an actuating device (28;228) for a control unit (22) for controlling the water temperature and/or the water flow rate in a water outlet… [read post]
