Search for: "Morrison v. Morrison" Results 441 - 460 of 2,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Alan Morrison looks at Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:46 am by Eric S. Schmitt
”  This echoes Justice Antonin Scalia’s statement in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 8:46 am by John Jascob
The petitioner argued that the AdPack sales were foreign transactions not subject to the court's jurisdiction under Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Justice Morrison’s decision as to guilt is expected on July 19, 2019. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:18 am
Departing from the United States Supreme Court’s 2010 opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action “exists where a party to a contract receives bills or invoices and does not protest within a reasonable time” (Russo v Heller, 80 AD3d 531, 532 (1st Dept 2011] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]), or where partial payment has been made (see Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Waters, 13 AD3d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Alan Morrison weighs in last week’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]