Search for: "New Doe Child #1 v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
It modifies the definition of neglect to state that it does not include allowing a child to engage in independent activities when taking into consideration the child’s level of maturity, physical condition, and mental abilities. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
It modifies the definition of neglect to state that it does not include allowing a child to engage in independent activities when taking into consideration the child’s level of maturity, physical condition, and mental abilities. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:33 pm
In so determining, the district court looked to other evidence that was the basis of other child pornography charges to determine the defendant's sexual proclivities.The question presented is whether or not extrensic evidence of other photographs helps determine if one of the United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:52 am
State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Flower, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0781 (Ariz. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Klemm, the justices ruled 8-1 that the one-year statute of limitations in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies even if the plaintiff does not discover the basis for the lawsuit until after the one-year deadline has passed. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
The questions presented are:1. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 3:32 pm
One Hope United, Inc. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm
A slow week in the Ninth lets us reach back to discuss the strong decision by Judge Goodwin in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
(The old cases were Original 1, 2 and 3, Wisconsin-Michigan-New York, et al., v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:19 am
Bowman v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
§ 922(g)(1). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
The truth or falsity of the information is an irrelevant inquiry in deciding whether the information is entitled to be protected and judges should be chary of becoming side-tracked into that irrelevant inquiry [86] The second is the authoritative decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court (In re Guardian News and Media Ltd & Others [2010] UKSC 1), in light of the (reasonably) clear and consistent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (See eg… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:20 am
Schaffer v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
