Search for: "New Jersey v. Williams" Results 441 - 460 of 752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 5:33 am by Sheppard Mullin
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey joined the New Jersey Superior Court in weighing in on the issue of whether a retailer violates consumer privacy state law by requesting a customer's zip code at the point of purchase. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:19 am by Sheppard Mullin
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey joined the New Jersey Superior Court in weighing in on the issue of whether a retailer violates consumer privacy state law by requesting a customer's zip code at the point of purchase. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:43 am by Brendon Tavelli
District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that a putative class action lawsuit against home goods retailer Williams-Sonoma failed to state a claim under New Jersey law. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:28 pm by Sara Alexandre
Robert Imbert and the New Jersey Superior Court felt otherwise. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
Quarterback’s Publicity Rights Claim Against Video Game Maker RejectedThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.The First Amendment barred former Rutgers quarterback Ryan Hart’s New Jersey common law right of publicity claim based on misappropriation of his likeness in the Electronic Arts video game NCAA Football, the federal district court in Trenton has ruled.Hart asserted the right of publicity in a class action complaint… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am by Sheppard Mullin
(“Williams-Sonoma”)  is currently pending in the District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:06 am by Sheppard Mullin
(“Williams-Sonoma”)  is currently pending in the District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
New Jersey, in which the Court held that a judge may only increase a sentence based upon facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as one example of the “perpetual dissent,” and he notes that the Justices will consider another case on this issue at their September 26 Conference. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:54 am by SHG
New Hampshire, the first the court will take a "hard look" at the issue since Manson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:20 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Lawyer and a Fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys, Eric practices in Fox Rothschild's Roseland, New Jersey office though he practices throughout New Jersey. [read post]