Search for: "O'Connor v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 5:46 am
Americans United For Separation of Church and State, where the government donated property instead of spending taxpayer money. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
(For a post-United Foods version of this problem, see Eric Goldman's post on Langdon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:57 pm
O'Connor, from Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney's New York office. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor described a similar habeas process, distinct from the Due Process Clause, in Hamdi v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Circuit Judges Roger L. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 1:59 am
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 1:57 pm
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor will be one of the three judges on a panel of the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals next week that will hear the appeal in Americans United for Separation of Church and State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
John Roberts is nothing like O'Connor. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:56 pm
O'Connor, 480 U.S. 709, 716, 107 S. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:58 pm
The AP's Mark Sherman reported here about how Justices Kennedy, O'Connor, and Scalia have defended their decision in Bush v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 11:23 am
O'Connor said the Florida court was "off on a trip of its own. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O';Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
The Board modified the judge's recommended Order to conform to the violations found and its standard remedial language, and modified the unit description in the Order to reflect the unit description alleged in the complaint and admitted by the Respondent in its answer. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
The 2001 ruling was 5-4, with O'Connor and the four liberals in the majority, so it is certainly possible that the newly constituted Court could overrule it. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Justice White concurring and dissenting in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:40 pm
Here is the abstract:In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held that a provision of Minnesota's rules regulating the conduct of judicial elections violated the free speech guarantees contained in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:27 am
In Monday's second argument, United Haulers Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 10:06 am
United States v. [read post]
