Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 1,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2019, 10:22 am by Tim Zubizarreta
His current case poses a question left open by former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s plurality opinion: whether, in the event that this war is unlike the wars that informed it and becomes perpetual, the military would be authorized to hold someone indefinitely as a combatant. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Countries with Data Privacy Laws – By Year 1973-2019, Graham Greenleaf, University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law The Common Law of Cyber-Trespass, Brooklyn Law Review, Forthcoming, Michael James OConnor, The Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am by MBettman
” Chief Justice OConnor, to the assistant public defender On May 8, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice OConnor, Justices French, Fischer, and former Justice DeGenaro* * Justices French, Fischer, and DeGenaro would have accepted both propositions of law. [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Dissent in Burson v Freeman Justice John Paul Stevens authored a dissent, which was joined by Justices Sandra Day OConnor and David H. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm by Melanie Fontes
Wade.Recent judicial biographies tell the story of how the “troika” of Justices Kennedy, OConnor, and Souter saved Roe in Casey v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
QUESTION: In your section on Richard Nixons 1968 presidential campaign, you write that “[n]o presidential candidate other than [Sen. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices DeWine, Kennedy, Fischer, and French No:  Chief Justice OConnor, and former Justice ODonnell Former Justice DeGenaro did not participate in this case. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Rachel E. Sachs
District Judge Reed OConnor agreed with the state attorneys general and declared the entire Act unconstitutional. [read post]