Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 6:41 am
New on the podcast: Flashbang grenades, “Docs v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 3:09 pm
(Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
Tweet Image via Wikipedia In Pezza v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
In Asadi v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 8:43 am
The court also held that the plaintiff’s allegations do not satisfy the recklessness standard, stating that it is a more compelling inference that the company and its executives negligently made an accounting error and subsequently corrected their public disclosures when they became aware of the error (Rotunno v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
(Backer, Larry Catá, "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Federalizing Norms for Officer, Lawyer and Accountant Behavior. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am
Suggs v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
United States, 13-7451 (involving whether Sarbanes-Oxley’s “anti-shredding” prohibition can be used to go after small fry) were first-time relists last week. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
” In Centaur Partners, IV v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:18 am
Break out the Sarbanes-Oxley treatise: The grant in “one-time” relist Lawson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 8:35 am
See, e.g., Vannoy v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:09 am
The case before the Supreme Court, Murray v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:47 pm
Review Bd., 514 F. 3d 468, 477 (5th Cir. 2008) (applying “reasonable belief” standard in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation action); Kalkunte v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:35 am
Review Bd., 514 F. 3d 468, 477 (5th Cir. 2008) (applying “reasonable belief” standard in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation action); Kalkunte v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:31 am
Willy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
Anti-Retaliation Under Federal and State Discrimination & Wage-Hour Laws; Implications of Burlington Northern v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
State (Judge Najam writing) and Sanders v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
