Search for: "Oakes v. Oakes" Results 441 - 460 of 1,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 3:37 am by SHG
  Secondly, they point to the fact that states have a duty, enshrined in Gideon v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
WWE 2K Videogame Doesn’t Infringe Tattoo Copyright By Depicting Basketball Players–Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games Copyright and Tattoos: Hangover II Injunction Denied, But the Copyright Owner Got Some Good News Too–Whitmill v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:20 pm
The press release provides a link to the California case (Guy Montag Doe, et al., v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 9:28 am by Eric Goldman
Sept. 26, 2020) Prior Tattoo Copyright Blog Posts Videogame Doesn’t Infringe Tattoo Copyright By Depicting Basketball Players–Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games Copyright and Tattoos: Hangover II Injunction Denied, But the Copyright Owner Got Some Good News Too–Whitmill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 10:55 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Juncal, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 869 (25 July 2008) Goldeagle Properties Ltd v Thornbury Court Ltd (Rev 1) [2008] EWCA Civ 864 (25 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Brittain v Courtway Estates Holdings SA & Anor [2008] EWHC 1791 (Ch) (25 July 2008) Whiteley Insurance Consultants (a/k As Kingfisher Travel Insurance Services), Re v [2008]… [read post]