Search for: "Oral Folks" Results 441 - 460 of 821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 7:29 am
Section 4102 of the ACA, for example, states: “The secretary shall develop oral healthcare components that shall include tooth-level surveillance. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:50 pm by Howard Knopf
And the Copyright Board is permitting and encouraging the sharing of information between SOCAN and Re:Sound.But that’s not all folks. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:58 pm by Rick Hasen
The fight now is between option 2 (which will almost certainly lead to a reversal of the Montana Supreme Court after briefing and oral arguments with some dissents) and option 3 (which will almost certainly lead to a reversal of the Montana Supreme Court without further argument with some dissents). [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm by Randy Barnett
 Rosen always likes to instruct conservatives about how to be good judicial conservative, lest they be accused of being activist by folks like Jeff Rosen. [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The Origins of the Oral Deposition in the Federal Rules: Who's in Charge? [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Jeffrey Vlasek
  Oral arguments regarding GlaxoSmithKline PLC’s sales reps were heard before the Supreme Court just last month. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Courts rarely object to hearings held just on the papers; discovery is never constitutionally required; oral hearings with cross-examination are sometimes required (e.g. if credibility will be at issue); access to counsel of your own choosing on your own nickel is generally required. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am by interns
Below is a recap of yesterday’s oral argument before the D.C. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:08 pm by Steve Vladeck
Wells and Larkin have a more comprehensive preview in the works for Thursday’s oral argument before the D.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm by Steve Vladeck
But, if nothing else, today’s order will make Thursday’s oral argument that much more interesting. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:24 am by David Bernstein
UPDATE: This story reminded me of the 1980s case of the twin red-haired Boston firefighters who claimed to be black, based on a photo of a great-grandmother and alleged oral history. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by SHG
  Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:19 pm by lawmrh
Supreme Court heard oral arguments over Arizona’s SB 1070 anti-illegal immigration law. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:48 am
Not trusting oral assurances from Portland City Hall bureaucrats? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Jeff Gamso
Here it is, thanks to the Wall Street Journal blog which apparently had part of the oral argument (you can find it and listen here) transcribed. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:32 am by SHG
Nobody, but nobody, expected a different outcome after oral argument in Florence v. [read post]