Search for: "Ortiz v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 590
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Video Software Dealers Association and Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am
The other, Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:04 am
Title: Ortiz v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 12:58 pm
See Totalplan Corp. of America v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:20 am
Dismissal from a position because the individual does not possess a valid required license or certification is not a disciplinary terminationMatter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 2010 NY Slip Op 02432, Decided on March 25, 2010, Court of Appeals[Decided with Matter of New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services v Victor Ortiz]These two cases involve State employees who were dismissed from… [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
This was stated by the Texas Supreme Court in, Ortiz v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the search of three residences in a Kansas City methamphetamine case in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:29 pm
See Ortiz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:26 pm
Conrad v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:30 am
A6941A Ortiz (MS) -- Enacts the "child sexual abuse and exploitation prevention act"; repealer Same as S 2205-A BLURB : CP L. chld sxl abse & expltn pvtnLast Act: 01/29/10 amend and recommit to codes01/29/10 print number 6941aLast Action Date: 02/01/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:58 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 3:39 am
Arbitrator to determine if CBA's disciplinary procedure applies in the event an employee is summarily dismissed due to the lack of certificationMatter of New York State Off. of Alcoholism & Substance Abuse Servs. v Ortiz, 62 AD3d 1118NYPPL recently summarize the decision in Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 62 AD3d 1109.Lanterman was terminated from her [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
I understand the point, and I might well have agreed with him had I been on the jury -- depending, of course, on the state of the evidence.But the Court of Appeal holds that even though, to me, Ortiz's decision to shoot seemed pretty spontaneous (indeed, totally inexplicable), it's still sufficient evidence to convict. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 3:43 am
Ortiz (C.A.7, 1996), 84 F.3d 977, 984 (following Chan in holding that a pager is a closed container), United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
Ortiz Subscription Required KINGS COUNTY Legal Profession Plaintiff Failed to Meet Burden Whether He Would Recover Award 'but for' Alleged Legal Malpractice Singh v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:14 am
Ortiz (C.A.7, 1996), 84 F.3d 977, 984 (following Chan in holding that a pager is a closed container), United States v. [read post]
