Search for: "P Smith" Results 441 - 460 of 3,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2021, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Maddow, the Ninth Circuit (in an opinion by Judge Milan Smith, joined by Judge John Owens and District Judge Eduardo Robreno) held that Maddow's statement about OAN fit the second illustration (which is constitutionally protected opinion). [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 12:50 pm by Tim De Chant
Enlarge (credit: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images) For years, employers have used surveillance to keep tabs on their employees on the job. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:17 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Janet Smith, writing in Crisis magazine, argues the disclosure of information was akin to the right of a spouse to know if their partner is being unfaithful.[7] I think both the Pillar and Janet Smith’s arguments fail, and fail decisively, for at least three reasons: First, to the extent one justifies the disclosure of a person’s movements as beneficial to an institution,  more is needed to justify disclosure to the public rather than simply to the… [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cathay Smith: Do you foresee a point in time at which an AI might be able to make a fair use/fair dealing decision in the moment? [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:41 pm by INFORRM
Other News In Australia, the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial in the Federal Court was postponed until November 2021 due to Sydney Covid crisis. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Patricia Hughes
In Search of the Ethical Lawyer (2016), p.109 for a list.) [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm by Rachel Casper
In a recording of a recent program with the Hampshire County Bar Association, Sofia Lingos of Trident Legal offers three essential steps for attorneys to complete the transition to paperless processes after the abrupt change brought by the pandemic. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 6:58 am by Russell Knight
“[P]arol evidence is admissible under certain circumstances, as in the case of an ambiguous or incomplete contract. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]