Search for: "P. v. Germany"
Results 441 - 460
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
Müller examined 59 megalithic sites in France (Brittany), Ireland, Scotland and northern Germany in order to determine which stellar (star) risings and settings were used for astronomical orientation in those days. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
P'ship, 131 S. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Frank P. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
See, e.g., Clinton Rossiter, The Supreme Court and the Commander in Chief 109 (Richard P. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:44 am
Under Article 21 of the 1945 Basic Law promulgated in West Germany after World War II, “[p]arties that, by reason of their aims or the behavior of their adherents, seek to undermine or abolish the free democratic basic order or to endanger the existence of the Federal Republic of Germany shall be unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am
Jan von Hein: “The applicability of Art. 5 No. 3 Brussels I-Regulation to damages caused by multiple tortfeasors” In Melzer v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:32 pm
But a less abridged reading shows that my stated purpose was much more modest: to “make some progress” in bridging the two fields (p. 2). [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:02 am
In TYM v Ms. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm
., 2014[29]2013 103 Strawberries (frozen)Other frozen berries may have been involvedDenmark, Finland, Norway, SwedenSuspected Egypt and Morocco based on virus strain and import historyUnknown, some cases matched the strain of the larger 2013 European outbreak (see below)Nordic Outbreak Investigation Team, 2013[30]20131589Berries (frozen)Italy (90% of cases), Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, SwedenMultiple food… [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
., 2014[19]2013 103 Strawberries (frozen)Other frozen berries may have been involvedDenmark, Finland, Norway, SwedenSuspected Egypt and Morocco based on virus strain and import historyUnknown, some cases matched the strain of the larger 2013 European outbreak (see below)Nordic Outbreak Investigation Team, 2013[20]20131589Berries (frozen)Italy (90% of cases), Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, SwedenMultiple food… [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
Vallee rendered judgment in Nakhuda v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:52 am
Excerpts from legal literature are provided for reference purposes: a) “The negotiating delegations in The Hague faced two major controversies: first, some civil law countries, including Germany, view the formal service of court documents as an official act of government; accordingly, they view any attempt by a foreign plaintiff to serve documents within their borders as an infringement on their sovereignty ” – Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
The U.S. lags behind other industrialized nations, including Australia, Canada, the UK, Germany and Norway – where serious, concerted efforts have been made to address discrimination against women in the board room. [read post]
