Search for: "PEREZ V JUSTICE"
Results 441 - 460
of 548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Schultz: In a plurality opinion authored by Justice Chambers and joined by Justices Sanders, Stephens, James Johnson and Charles Johnson, the Court overturned Ms. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:29 pm
"In Najera v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2011] EWCA Civ 1: read judgment. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
Adam Perez, No. 10? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am
While pre-action disclosure is often thought of as a device to enable the plaintiff to frame a complaint (see generally Matter of Wien & Malkin v Wichman, 255 AD2d 244 [1998]; Matter of Perez v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:41 pm
Department of Justice (No.10-851)). [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
" (21) This process should be distinguished conceptually as "general international law", rather than CIL, as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has often done. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:51 am
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today announced that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:17 am
Civil Rights Commission that no political leadership was involved in the decision (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:11 pm
"Sonny" Chastain and Linda Perez Clark The Louisiana Supreme Court in Cheramie Services, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm
Perez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
The ADA requires that individuals with disabilities be provided services in the most integrated setting appropriate, as determined by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision Olmstead v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Bringing a challenge to same-sex marriage to federal court in 2010 is a little like trying to get the federal courts to decide Lawrence in 1972 or Loving in 1948, immediately after California's decision in Perez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
This time, Justice Stevens in Arizona v. [read post]
