Search for: "PEREZ v. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2007, 5:26 am
App. 2006) (holding nonimmigration status does not bar individual's right to establish residency for purposes of obtaining dissolution of marriage in that state and citing Perez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
That's the rule in Darnell v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm
Beck v City of Hillsboro, MO, 2023 WL 2734079 (ED Mo. 3/31/2023) [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:22 am
Perez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm
Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:35 am
Last week, the U. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:29 am
But the 29th Annual Edward V. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:20 am
The trial judge applied the learned intermediary doctrine, rejecting plaintiff's allegation that the so-called DTC exception applied pursuant to Perez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Perez v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
Bashaw v Republic State Mortgage Co, No 01-14-00427-CV (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 10:26 am
[Turkey] [Habitual residence][rights of custody] [ne exeat right]In Tatari v Durust, 2025 WL 327984, Not For Publication, (United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:51 am
Perez, 280 F.3d 318, 340 (3d Cir. 2002); United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
De Alba Pagan, 33 F.3d 125, 129 (1st Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:01 pm
Perez-Perez, No. 06-30341 (10-22-07). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
Castillo-Perez v. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Perry and respondent Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
