Search for: "POWELL v. UNITED STATES" Results 441 - 460 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Title 59 Chapter 27 is a content-based tax that violates the First Amendment; and 2) whether that tax passes intermediate scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that “[t]hree presidential electors in Washington state who voted for Colin Powell in 2016 rather than Hillary Clinton and were fined under state law are asking the US Supreme Court to take up their appeal and decide whether a state can bind an elector to vote for the state’s popular vote winner. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by David Markus
Judge Wilson, joined by a visiting judge, issued this opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
  (I'll leave for another day her implicit claim that the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case and overrule X.)But Justice Liu is also correct. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm by Tobias Thienel
The right of access therefore does not apply (see Powell and Rayner v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 2:18 pm
Consider, for example, United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:26 am by John Jascob
However, because the Commission has acknowledged that fiduciary duties may arise and state laws vary, customers could benefit from a uniform standard of conduct, said Berkovitz (Emily v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:48 pm
This is like the Times's reporting on Cohen v. [read post]