Search for: "Parker v. Parker."
Results 441 - 460
of 2,562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
, says Merpel], that referral remains a very important one for several reasons.Going back to C-264/19, let’s see how AG Øe reasoned, and what the implications of his Opinion might be.BackgroundThere is not much to add re the background to this case beyond what is stated above: the dispute between film producer Constantin Film [a company that has been party to some topical recent CJEU cases, including: the referral concerning availability of blocking injunctions under EU copyright… [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
The Court uses this case to clarify the rules for certain collective actions.The case is Scott v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Delaware’s Weird—and Constitutionally Suspect—Approach to Judicial Independence By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps discusses an upcoming Supreme Court case, Carney v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:58 am
Diehr, 450 U.S. 101 at 187; Parker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
Brandenburg v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Liles Parker has published a series of articles highlighting the waivers and other actions taken by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other Federal and State agencies to ease the burden on healthcare providers during the COVID-19 public health emergency.[2] This article is the first in a two-part series that will highlight some of the more significant provisions of the Cares Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 8:39 am
V. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Liles Parker PLLC [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020): On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
In Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:29 am
Adjusting to the moment, he was teaching the First Amendment, which of necessity required the teaching of Brandenburg v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:08 am
See Diehr, 450 U.S. at 187; Parker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
Recent Developments in Personal Care and Other Home and Community-Based Services in Medicaid and Medicare I. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
V. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Parker Drilling Co., 337 F.3d 558, 563 (5th Cir. 2003) (“the regulations govern the parties’ joint and several liabilities vis-à-vis the Government not amongst themselves”) and Total E&P USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Parker Drilling Co., 337 F.3d 558, 563 (5th Cir. 2003) (“the regulations govern the parties’ joint and several liabilities vis-à-vis the Government not amongst themselves”) and Total E&P USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
Medicare Revocation Actions Under 42 CFR § 424.535(a) are Rising Around the Country! [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) Medicare Revocation Actions — Your Medicare Billing Privileges Can be Revoked For a Host of New Reasons. [read post]