Search for: "Patch v. Patch"
Results 441 - 460
of 995
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2016, 9:09 am
In the case, Murphy-Hylton v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Fluence v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:57 am
In the case of Frith v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
Despite the challenge to its foundational authority posed in FTC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:50 am
Secure Computing and its 2006 decision in Plumtree Software v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
See Singh v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:23 am
Oracle America, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:55 am
Lucia Companies v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 5:30 am
We Could Not Look the Survivors in the Eye if We Did Not Follow this Lead The Security Debate We Need to Have Trust, Apple, and the First Amendment Having an Open and Honest Debate About Security Apple and FBI: PIN Codes to Update Firmware, Code as Free Speech, Legislative Clarification On Preventing the Widespread Use of a Law-Enforcement-Friendly iOS Patch How to Destroy Pandora's iPhone Demystifying Apple’s FAQ – A Rebuttal On Setting Precedents in the… [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
Register here" (Patch). [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 8:08 am
Puts a temporary patch on the leak. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm
The record further reflects that while hotfixes are commonly used in the industry, their uses are generally to fix or patch critical bugs or defects—not to enact substantive and significant new features. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:51 am
Arnett v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:54 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the Commonwealth's highest court, ruled in the case of Papadopoulos v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:54 am
Bondi v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
Can the vulnerability be patched or otherwise mitigated? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
J&J, 2008 WL 5539279 (contraceptive patch) Deposition2008-04-07 Tomko v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:50 am
Pennsylvania v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:23 am
FTC v. [read post]
