Search for: "Paul Horwitz"
Results 441 - 460
of 488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
Rebecca Tushnet, The Yes Men and the Women Men Don't SeeI begin with a claim that is likely to be demoralizing, but also reveals some interesting features of privacy: In practice, Americans and many other Westerners care more about privacy as against their neighbors than they do about privacy as against their governments. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Morton Horwitz wrote such a review essay, Dirk Hartog wrote one; Bob Gordon wrote one. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
(3) Finally, Paul Horwitz has written a series of excellent blog posts on Teaching Legal Ethics in a Legal Recession (and here and here). [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 9:31 am
Others debated whether Coulter was (correction: whether the idea of "perfecting Jews" was, see the comment) really anti-Semitic, with Jeralyn Merritt at TalkLeft saying yes and David Bernstein at Volokh Conspiracy and Paul Horwitz at PrawfsBlawg saying no. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
As Paul Horwitz observes, the "influence of leftist rhetoric" is "vanishingly small in American politics. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:50 pm
Edward White, Chuck McCurdy, and Paul Gaston at the University of Virginia, and David Herbert Donald, Morton Horwitz, Bernard Bailyn, and Alan Brinkley of Harvard University. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 10:41 am
Sari Horwitz reports in the Post that the DOJ will likely not charge Julian Assange for publishing classified documents. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Still more commentary comes from Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice; from Adam Winkler at the Huffington Post; at PrawfsBlawg, where posts come from Richard Re, Howard Wasserman (who has four posts on the decision and how it is being implemented), Paul Horwitz, Rick Hills, and Hadar Aviram; from Karl Laird at the Oxford Human Rights Hub; at the Human Rights at Home Blog from Noah Novogrodsky; and from John Culhane for POLITICO. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm
Lots more good stuff has been written about The New Republic’s demise (intellectuals and journalists mourn their own), like this from Jack Goldsmith, this from Paul Horwitz, this from Dan Drezner, and this from Megan McCardle. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:13 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Paul Horwitz opines on senators’ views with regard to the questioning of judicial nominees, in a response to a recent Mirror of Justice post on the subject. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
Yet, Paul Horwitz argues that being an idiot isn’t a good enough reason to ignore First Amendment law and levy punishment. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
Update: At Prawfsblawg, Paul Horwitz skewers his own. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
As Paul pointed out yesterday, the House Rules Committee decided upon the chamber’s floor procedure for a significant cybersecurity bill, CISPA. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:15 pm
As Paul Horwitz observes, the “influence of leftist rhetoric” is “vanishingly small in American politics. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:07 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Paul Horwitz recounts Democratic Senator Charles Schumer’s 2007 law review article in which he wrote that Senators during confirmations should “ask[ ] tough and specific questions and [to use] the tools at their disposal to demand answers. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
As Paul Horwitz responded, this isn’t the first time academics have discussed the moribund law review article. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
Sch. of Law); (9) Paul Butler (The Geo. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:27 am
After Hills' first stab at this idea, fellow PrawfsBlawger Paul Horwitz said: It is possible that law professors are less likely to be "corrupt" than these other lawyers, depending on how you define the term, if for no other reason than that they are less likely to be worldly, or at least successfully worldly. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary comes from Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, James Gottry at The Hill, Thomas Berg at America, Gregory Lipper at casetext, Zac Bears at The Double Standard, David Fontana at Slate, Jessica Mason Pieklo at RH Reality Check, Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Elizabeth Wydra at Reuters, Paul Horwitz and Howard Wasserman (in three posts) at PrawfsBlawg, and Ian Millhiser at Think Progress. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Franita Tolson offers her predictions regarding the case, while Paul Horwitz offers “some lighter, but fairly confident, predictions of [his] own. [read post]
