Search for: "People in Interest of TM"
Results 441 - 460
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Indigenous people have to come up with different arguments for access, copying, and control. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:21 am
(The evidence was that its employees who were worried about loss of goodwill “had to expend effort and energy to go around and try to ... tell people and convince them that it wasn’t true” and “spent a lot of time going to customers and trying to correct the misinformation, a lot of meetings, direct meetings, letter-writing, things like that. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:40 am
Google and eBay (and Facebook and Twitter) appear to be privatizing TM law as well as copyright, perhaps more so in the US than in Europe. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:34 am
People are reading a lot less literature. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:32 am
(Though Lemley doesn't believe in licensing rights for TMs generally, at least not for communicative/secondary products.)Q: What about penalties for wrongly putting a patent in the Orange Book? [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
Who wants a device devoid of access to interesting content? [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
” Instead: be tempered, esp. w/public health interest. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
That’s why he’s interested in the expert’s foundation. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:05 am
Do people have an advantage over pets in litigation? [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
History is one answer, but not of as much interest to him. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
The court also does not expressly kill off initial interest confusion. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
Interference with speech affects both parties’ speech interests, but the public forum doctrine doesn’t recognize that. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Courts use a lot of tests; consensus in TM developing around Rogers, but no such consensus exists in RoP despite the fact that these cases are almost always brought as RoP and §43(a) cases. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:37 pm
Just goes to show how creativity can result in a positive benefit for planet and profit (and presumably the people who worked on the project as well). [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm
KTC: A couple of people mentioned licensing. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
His position is that Reputation.com actually represents consumer interests, not EFF. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
So anything you give these poor people will be better than what they had before. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
I’ll only discuss the stuff I find interesting. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
We don't want to take over your show; that's your job and you are answerable to your members' interests. [read post]
