Search for: "People of the State of New York v. Smith" Results 441 - 460 of 870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
The New York Times reports that Google is changing its algorithm to prevent certain websites, which enable unverified or slanderous claims about certain individuals, from appearing in search results. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:32 pm by Gene Takagi
” Washington Post“The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that Americans have a broad right to arm themselves in public, striking down a New York law that placed strict limits on carrying guns outside the home and setting off a scramble in other states that have similar restrictions. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
 Text: H.R.461 — 117th Congress (2021-2022)All Information (Except Text) There is one version of the bill.Text available as:XML/HTML (19KB)XML/HTML (new window) (16KB)TXT (11KB)PDF (277KB) (PDF provides a complete and accurate display of this text.) [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Ann Arbor categorically bans such discrimination based on arrest record.[3] Madison, Urbana, and Champaign do the same as to arrest record or conviction record.[4] Connecticut bans discrimination based on expunged criminal records.[5] New Jersey bans discrimination based on criminal history involving possession, distribution, or manufacturing of marijuana and hashish.[6] Illinois, Hawaii, New York, and Wisconsin also ban such discrimination in employment,[7] so it's… [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York 2015). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 5:24 am
Schaerr, representing California and 20 other states that entered the case, Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
Comedy Partners (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D New York: Louboutin blue over red sole decision favouring YSL – preliminary injunction denied: Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]