Search for: "People of the State of New York v. Smith"
Results 441 - 460
of 871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
In 2009, the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, issued an important decision in People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Smith (7th Cir. 1978); Tollett v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
This was done first in New York, in the Field Code of 1848. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
54 A.D.3d 883 864 N.Y.S.2d 111 2008 NY Slip Op 7024 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
City of New York (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
See New York Times Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York 2015). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
As the Heller II court did, this Criminal Court concludes that New York's licensing scheme is substantially related to this important governmental interest. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
Smith…. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 3:52 pm
Related Issues: NSA SpyingRelated Cases: Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
Guest Post by Professor Amelia Smith Rinehart (University of Utah) Recently, the Federal Circuit held that the New York Times and others infringed patents claiming methods and systems for delivering content to smartphones.[1] In a related Patently-O essay, Professor Sam Ernst states that the Federal Circuit’s opinion in Helferich is “directly contrary to Supreme Court precedent and represents a fundamental misunderstanding of one of the core purposes… [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:44 am
New York State Office of Mental Health, N.D.N.Y.).) [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
” MLive covered the event and posted a short video of Justice Ginsburg discussing the Court’s 1996 decision in United States v. [read post]
