Search for: "People v A. M."
Results 441 - 460
of 12,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2007, 2:54 pm
I'm gonna try to use it a lot more than I do. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
So I'm definitely learning. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 2:44 pm
Appellate courts grant lower courts huge leeway in this arena, so I'm not surprised in the slightest that the California Supreme Court finds that there was no reversible error.Nonetheless, I thought the dynamic in the trial court warranted at least mention.It's a murder case (of course), so at the penalty phase, the prosecution has the murdered victim's seven year old brother testify. [read post]
7 May 2021, 2:34 pm
Given that report, I'm glad the fire department showed up.Now, when he gets there, the fire captain sees no fire and no smoke. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
I understand Part II, but I'm seriously thinking deeply about Part III. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
Which I'll now do:The California Supreme Court should grant review of this opinion.I'm not saying that because I believe Justice Kriegler's decision to be necessarily wrong and/or pernicious. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
This is certainly good police work, and at some level, I'm impressed with the talent of the officers here. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 12:04 pm
Sometimes you read opinions in the Court of Appeal and just think: "Man, I'm so, so glad that's not me. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
I'm not sure why this one appears so complicated.It's not a long opinion -- nine (double-spaced) pages, including the caption. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Rightly so.I'm less confident that Justice Wiley is correct when he says "This mental state—requiring only proof that Canales voluntarily inserted his finger or penis into his stepdaughter’s vagina, without any further level of mental culpability—satisfies the presumption of mandatory culpability. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
As to which I'm on board.Makes justice better. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
Paul M. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:43 am
And as Steve Sachs notes, there is a pending stay application in City of Chicago v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 3:14 pm
I'm thinking it's a water polo game, but it could be basketball, soccer, or what have you. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
I'm trying to figure out the incentive effects here.Obviously, with an increasingly conservative Court, the exclusionary rule has been cut back during the past couple of decades. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
I'm very familiar with the kinds of sentences that are routinely handed out in these types of cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm
Deterrence -- either special or general -- seems a fairly weak rationale for slamming the guy as well, since people hopped up on DMT and 'shrooms are hardly thinking seriously about the consequences of their conduct nor likely to be affected by a contemporaneous thought about whether they'll be spending 5, 15, 30, or whatever years in prison as a result of their offense.Retribution seems like the strongest argument for seriously punishing the guy. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:21 pm
I'm free in the meantime, and you gotta give me a hearing before you hold me once my 1-year sentence is up. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm
I'm sure Gonzalez was willing to help confront Hector and see if he was with a rival gang, and maybe -- maybe -- go along with an assault if he was. [read post]
