Search for: "People v Arena" Results 441 - 460 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm by Joseph Grodin
Thirteen years ago this tension came before the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the actual outcome of the case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There’s mere wordplay to say that photos are transformed from documentation of wedding to confirmation of text saying people are married.Then there’s White v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
One of the more significant recent developments in the corporate and securities litigation arena has been the emergence of the debate over fee-shifting bylaws following the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The much-awaited Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am by Heather K. Gerken
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm by Jarod Bona
The names of the plaintiffs in these cases conveniently rhyme, so people in the takings arena refer to this doctrine as the Nollan and Dolan requirements. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm by Georgialee Lang
“See you in court” is a threat that is feared by most people, with the exception of trial lawyers, who have studied, practiced and for the most part, crave the adrenalin pumping through their veins, like gladiators entering the arena. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm
For years Wells Fargo has been unusually aggressive in this arena. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Today’s ruling will affect many different arenas of religious liberty litigation. [read post]