Search for: "People v Goode" Results 441 - 460 of 22,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2017, 11:43 pm by The Dear Rich Staff
 The appealing feature of copyrights is that with a copyright you can sue people for infringements that occur before registration. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 8:42 pm
This is why you like to see incredibly smart people -- sometimes academics, even -- appointed to the Court of Appeals.It's an erudite, comprehensive, and incredibly good opinion. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
  But doing so nicely.It's good to see judges remembering that appeals involve real people with real problems. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:53 pm by Ilya Somin
[M]any on the political left in the US have made the charge that the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 11:47 am
But even profoundly disturbed individuals are -- apparently -- capable of being good attorneys. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:02 pm
Getting hooked on Vicodin, it seems, is not a good life, and entails an extremely hard habit to control. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:05 am by Tom Smith
Critics say the Court’s 6-3 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm by Michael Perry
The Individual Mandate, Sovereignty, and the Ends of Good Government: A Reply to Professor Randy Barnett Patrick McKinley Brennan Villanova University School of Law University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2011 Abstract:Randy Barnett has recently argued that the individual mandate is unconstitutional because it is an improper regulation under the Necessary and Proper Clause (in conjunction with the Commerce Clause) because it improperly "commandeers" the people and thereby… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:19 am by Richard Aynes - Guest
Writing in anticipation of the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am by SHG
There’s certainly a good chance that every opinion won’t be as accommodating to gay rights as Box v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm
This seems to me to be a good test case for whether or not you believe in retribution as a justification for criminal punishment.Hayden Gerson is seemingly an ordinary fellow, with no apparent criminal history, but in 2016 becomes fascinated with -- and starts heavily using -- DMT and psilocybin ("mushrooms"). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  We don't like to exclude evidence, so we come up with a zillion different exceptions.The one that the Court of Appeal applies today is the "good faith precedent" exception. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:52 pm
In October I wrote about the risks of moving, pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38) and Anders v California (386 US 738), to be relieved as assigned appellate attorney on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issues. [read post]