Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 5:57 am
In the Lord Browne case (Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd 2007) the judge agreed with Associated that knowing that there was a relationship between Lord Browne and Jeff Chevalier was ‘important background in authenticating in readers’ minds the other allegations they [the newspaper] wish to publish’ which were considered to be in the public interest. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:56 am
It was clear that the wrongs which were the subject of the appellant’s claims were separate and were committed at different times by different people. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Those email addresses were used by the people who had posted the reviews to register with Trustpilot. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
As Lord Neuberger explained, the assessment of what is an “ordinary homeless person” was more likely to lead to “arbitrary and unpredictable outcomes” and to result in support being denied to very needy people ([56]). [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
And this actually should make sense in connection with Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:31 am
Lord Sales and Lord Burrows gave the sole judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am
The injunction which was granted against Mr Jones included provisions preventing him from entering a large area in central Birmingham, associating with or contacting ten people named in the injunction, and participating in music videos containing material which might relate to gangs operating in Birmingham. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
However he recognised that the issue has a transnational dimension and has important implications for many millions of people across the EU making use of the internet. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 1:22 am
Open justice v parental protectiveness The court considered the matter against the baseline principle of open justice laid down by the House of Lords (then the highest court in the land) in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:20 am
Most famously, Lord Halsbury delivered the opinion of the Judicial Committee in Riel v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am
“ Meanwhile, the Second Reading of Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill is to be on 9 July 2010, Lords Lester, Pannick and McNally are listed as speaking, along with Baroness Young of Hornsey. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In Thoburn v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Has Chavez-Vilchez altered the approach to derivative claims for residence in the UK? [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 11:04 pm
However, in the famous case of Street v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
At paragraph 17 Lord Steyn sets out four propositions : First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
