Search for: "People v Sharp" Results 441 - 460 of 1,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm by Paul M. Hauge
In sharp contrast, Hess operated a refinery and storage facility that covered 210 acres, was located next to sensitive waterways, and repeatedly discharged hazardous substances that injured natural resources and exposed people to potential harm. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2011] EWCA Civ 1: read judgment. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
On 16 March 2021 the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P, Warby LJ) heard an appeal in the case of Millett v Corbyn. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
In a sharp 2-1 decision, the appeals court judges agreed with Jarkesy. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
He was just six years old when the Court decided Brown v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:08 pm by Emily Galik
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
In many way, this case is similar to Moore v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
"* The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark DecisionFormer GuestKat Mike Mireles and Kat friend Henry Liao dicuss the fresh court decision (from the Supreme People’s Court of China) on the Michael Jordan trade mark/name-personality case. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am by Florian Mueller
Sharp decision by the Supreme People's Court (SPC) of the People's Republic of China (PRC) already demonstrated that the Chinese judiciary considers it stance on SEPs to be balanced and perfectly compatible with the concept of international comity (which in this context means that courts in one country respect their counterparts in another).Even clearer is the message that the Chinese government has for the EU. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Sims – and in Knick v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:20 am by Rosalind English
As the claimant here says, why should I be denied a right, the right to die of my own choosing when able-bodied people have that right and only my disability prevents me from exercising that right? [read post]