Search for: "People v West" Results 441 - 460 of 3,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2017, 11:03 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
But as our nursing home abuse attorneys have come to know, people often don’t realize what they’re signing. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:23 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Today marks the 75th anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
West, The Free Exercise of Religion in America: Its Original Constitutional Meaning, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2019). [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:33 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Horvitz Professor of Law, Harvard Law SchoolOct. 9 Risa Goluboff, John Allan Love Professor of Law and Professor of History, University of Virginia, “People out of Place: The Sixties, the Supreme Court, and Vagrancy Law”Comment: Lisa McGirr, Professor of History, Department of History, Harvard UniversityOct 16: Serena Mayeri, Professor of Law and History, University of Pennsylvania, “Status of Marriage: Marital Supremacy Challenged and Remade, 1960-2000”Comment:… [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:54 pm
Beckloff from the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Seven beginning August 17 until September 30, 2015.Judge Sam Ohta of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Eight August 31, 2015Today's DJ features Justice Hoffstadt's latest column, Brady's Self-Help Exception, re People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
 This, the 55th weekly summary, is what you've missed:* TK to the Max: Acknowledging traditions"Economics is not heartless", writes Nicola, and she somehow proves that with this delicious post on the economics of traditional knowledge (TK) as it relates to indigenous peoples.* Traditional knowledge and cultural genocide: a letter from Canada’s West CoastAfter Nicola’s economic analysis, TK is immediately back on the agenda thanks to Katfriend… [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The word “objection” alone was insufficient to preserve the issue for our review"]; People v. [read post]