Search for: "People v. Baker" Results 441 - 460 of 1,045
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Comment In many ways unsurprising, this decision confirms that people who choose, voluntarily, to put themselves into the public eye and to accept money provided by the taxpayer, cannot expect a free ride when it comes to transparency. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm by Giles Peaker
See generally the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in the judgment of Scott Baker J in R (Khan) v London Borough of Newham [2001] EWHC Admin 589 at paragraphs 8 to 14. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
Take Constance Baker Motley, an African-American woman who spent a long legal career with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, litigating desegregation cases (including Brown v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am by Graham Smith
On my understanding of the draft Bill that would include blogs and newspaper sites[v]. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am by Graham Smith
On my understanding of the draft Bill that would include blogs and newspaper sites[v]. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:12 am by Garrett Hinck
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
Judge Spath seems skeptical as to why he needs to duplicate Baker’s order. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
Wittes issued an editor’s note related to Baker’s post. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
 Annabelle now writes to let us know that she has put online the various videos of each presentation, for those people who could not attend the seminar. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:59 pm by Ilya Somin
  Today, Texas state trial Judge David Peeples issued a decision in Van Stean v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
“ Mr Justice Baker commented that the testimony “illustrates how the fear of press intrusion may affect the lives of ordinary people who have not sought to be cast into the public gaze“. [read post]